Spiers, Cindy J. 「Commitment and Stability in Lesbian Relationships.」 Ph. D diss., University of Maryland College Park, 1998.
Abstract:
This study of 227 self-identified lesbians, recruited primarily through
the Internet, was designed to apply a model of relationship stability
developed with a heterosexual population to a lesbian population. Specifically,
the model tested was based on Stanley and Markman's (1992) research
using the Commitment Inventory, which breaks commitment into two factors:
personal dedication, such as a strong sense of 'couple identity', and
a belief in the importance of commitments, and external constraints
to leaving a relationship, such as financial and legal bonds. Stability
was operationalized in two ways: a self-report measure comprised of
5 items used by Rusbult (1983), 3 items used by Peplau, Padesky and
Hamilton (1982), and 7 items from Sternberg's (1988) triangular assessment
of love scale, and actual relationship longevity. Three other variables,
self-disclosure of sexual orientation, self-acceptance of sexual orientation,
and satisfaction were included in the model as moderator variables in
the hypothesized relationship between personal dedication, external
constraints on a relationship, and stability. Regression analyses found
two different models were supported depending on the measure of stability
used. Specifically, 59% of the total variance in self-report stability
was accounted for by personal dedication, satisfaction, self-disclosure,
the interaction between personal dedication and self-disclosure, and
the interaction between satisfaction and constraints on a relationship.
Of the variance accounted for by this model, three-fourths was explained
by personal dedication alone. In contrast, only 3% of the variance in
actual relationship longevity was accounted for, all of which was explained
by constraints on a relationship. The correlation between the two measures
of stability was.21 ($p<.01).$ These findings closely parallel findings
from research on heterosexual couples (Adams and Jones, 1997; and Stanley
and Markman, 1992) Results seem to indicate that aspects of commitment
based on self-perception are predictive of one's perception of relationship
stability, whereas more behavioral aspects of commitment are predictive
of actual staying together in relationships. Recently, Adams and Jones
(1997) have argued for refining the definition of commitment to include
only intentionality aspects, such as personal dedication, with factors
such as constraints being understood as a separate construct which act
in concert with commitment to affect the endurance of a relationship.
The findings from the current study support this conclusion. |