| Spiers, Cindy J.  「Commitment and Stability in Lesbian Relationships.」 Ph. D diss., University of Maryland College Park, 1998.
         Abstract: This study of 227 self-identified lesbians, recruited primarily through 
          the Internet, was designed to apply a model of relationship stability 
          developed with a heterosexual population to a lesbian population. Specifically, 
          the model tested was based on Stanley and Markman's (1992) research 
          using the Commitment Inventory, which breaks commitment into two factors: 
          personal dedication, such as a strong sense of 'couple identity', and 
          a belief in the importance of commitments, and external constraints 
          to leaving a relationship, such as financial and legal bonds. Stability 
          was operationalized in two ways: a self-report measure comprised of 
          5 items used by Rusbult (1983), 3 items used by Peplau, Padesky and 
          Hamilton (1982), and 7 items from Sternberg's (1988) triangular assessment 
          of love scale, and actual relationship longevity. Three other variables, 
          self-disclosure of sexual orientation, self-acceptance of sexual orientation, 
          and satisfaction were included in the model as moderator variables in 
          the hypothesized relationship between personal dedication, external 
          constraints on a relationship, and stability. Regression analyses found 
          two different models were supported depending on the measure of stability 
          used. Specifically, 59% of the total variance in self-report stability 
          was accounted for by personal dedication, satisfaction, self-disclosure, 
          the interaction between personal dedication and self-disclosure, and 
          the interaction between satisfaction and constraints on a relationship. 
          Of the variance accounted for by this model, three-fourths was explained 
          by personal dedication alone. In contrast, only 3% of the variance in 
          actual relationship longevity was accounted for, all of which was explained 
          by constraints on a relationship. The correlation between the two measures 
          of stability was.21 ($p<.01).$ These findings closely parallel findings 
          from research on heterosexual couples (Adams and Jones, 1997; and Stanley 
          and Markman, 1992) Results seem to indicate that aspects of commitment 
          based on self-perception are predictive of one's perception of relationship 
          stability, whereas more behavioral aspects of commitment are predictive 
          of actual staying together in relationships. Recently, Adams and Jones 
          (1997) have argued for refining the definition of commitment to include 
          only intentionality aspects, such as personal dedication, with factors 
          such as constraints being understood as a separate construct which act 
          in concert with commitment to affect the endurance of a relationship. 
          The findings from the current study support this conclusion.
 |