statement of purpose 4
(雷)
I should have written
this statement seven years ago; sadly, the Asian financial crisis of 1997
forced me to abandon my plan to study overseas then. While
seven years of waiting may help most people get over their
frustration and forget their enthusiasm, I never gave up on my dream
to further my studies in law.
I had always been a good
student. I was good at
memorizing and comprehending and could understand and apply the laws
precisely. Performing
well in classes and getting good grades were not difficult tasks for
me, so I quickly lost myself in over-confidence. It
was an encounter in a casual party that woke me up to the meager
reality of my professional achievement.
Information technology was taking off in Taiwan in the
mid-1990s and many students were crazy about the BBS.
Their interactions on the internet sometimes would exceed the
rules of good behavior. At the party, I was chatting confidently with everybody when
the host, Prof. Wu of the Dept. of Economics, turned and asked me
how I would deal with the new phenomenon on the internet. I was caught by surprise, blushed and could not find anything
sensible to say. Prof.
Wu then said, 「The existence of law is to solve the problems in
human society. As a
student of the law school, you must open your eyes to observe the
changes of society and develop ability to analyze new phenomena and
to design corresponding mechanisms.」 Shamefully, I realized that my outlook on law had been quite
limited. I decided to
learn more, observe more critically, and question the usual way of
looking at the world.
It was another professor
of economics who led me to explore the fantastic world of law. A
friend had told me that economics would be a useful tool to improve
my analytic ability, but I did not take it seriously for I myself
had already taken an introductory economics course in my freshman
year. In my memory,
economics was a boring combination of lines, curves and figures. My friend persuaded me to give it another chance, so I took a
course taught by Professor Chen. I
was totally fascinated with his clear explanation of theories and
the application of economics in my life. He
discussed topical news with me and tried to analyze various
phenomena in economics. The
course became dialogues between Prof. Chen and me. Because
of my interest, he introduced me to many books about economic
analysis of law, and I developed a keen interest in applying the
economic method to consider legal issues.
The reasons, spirit and value of law became clearer and
clearer in my mind, and the progress helped me pass all
qualification examinations for bar and judge smoothly.
When the economic storm
hit Asia, it also shot down my plan to study abroad. With the substantial devaluation
of NT dollar caused by the
Asian financial crisis, I was forced to
give up my plan and take up a professional life.
At the age of 25, I became a judge. The
position was really a tremendous burden and challenge for me. I
tried to do my best and overcome my deficiency. Once
I receive a case about construction. The
plaintiff, a contractor, sued the defendant, a senior high school,
for remuneration. According
to the contract, the contractor had to construct a building and
decorate it with granite pieces.
The contractor had completed the work on time. However,
one month later, many spots appeared on the surface of the granite
pieces and the defending high school refused to pay any more
remuneration. The contractor argued that the spots were due to
irresistible causes. In
order to understand the cause for such stains, I located a Japanese
textbook that introduces stone construction and began learning about
construction. Eventually
I found out that the spots appeared because the plaintiff had
omitted the procedure of waterproofing. On
the next court day, I tactfully brought up my finding and discussed
the possibility with the parties involved.
My newly acquired professional knowledge help me persuade the
plaintiff to admit his fault, and the dispute was settled quickly. I
was proud that I was able to achieve a win-win outcome and save the
costs involved in legal procedures.
In the years to come, I continued this strategy of learning
more about the cases so as to make the best judgement.
My work also developed my
interests in the fields of technology law and patent law. The
court that I was serving was located near Hsinchu Science Park, so I
had many opportunities to hear complicated litigations related to
patents and high technology. Since I had no technology background, it was hard for me to
clarify related facts. To
raise my level of knowledge, I registered at the Institute of
Technology Law of National Chiao Tung University, where I gained
plenty of amazing knowledge. Once
I received a case about the defects of the chips in the ADSL modem,
and I was confused by the design and function of the chips.
Unexpectedly, I learned something helpful the next week in the
course of information technology. Due
to the exposure to technology law, I become more confident and
capable of solving high-tech disputes.
The field of patent law
attracts me, too. Initially,
I was interested in the issue of patent infringements. To
many judges, it is difficult to determine the constitution of
infringements and the assessment of damages. Therefore,
I researched related cases in the United States, Japan and Taiwan
thoroughly, analyzed the patent legislations, and suggested
amendments for Taiwan』s patent law. My
thesis about patent infringements won third prize in the thesis
competition held by the Judicial Yuan. Due
to the experience of hearing patent cases, I have opportunities to
observe the operation of patent system and reconsider its
efficiency.
It is undeniable that I
gained much from the career as a judge, but the job took away all my
time to do research. Besides,
I am still mostly attracted to legal research, through which I hope
to change our inflexible and inappropriate legislation. In the
future, I plan to engage in the work of legal research and
policymaking, especially in the fields of patent law and
international intellectual property law. In
Taiwan, most scholars argue that the patent system helps stimulate
innovation and economic growth. I
agree with the argument to some extent, yet the extremely expensive
legal costs of the patent system and its negative impacts on
competition and research can not be overlooked. I
would like to find ways to reduce the cost.
In recent years, the
territory of the IPRs have expanded at a fast pace under various
international regimes. Among
those regimes, the most controversial one is the World Trade
Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS). When
IPRs intersected with other policy spaces, such as development,
public health, bio-diversity, plant genetic resources and human
rights, tensions between existant IPRs regimes and other
international regimes arise. The conflicts among different players are shifting
international intellectual property lawmaking. I
am interested in analyzing the conflicts and possible balances both
from the aspects of efficiency and distribution. The
context of the AIDS epidemic and its subsequent developments under
the framework of TRIPS also intrigue me immensely. In fact, my Master thesis is exactly on the topic of
pharmaceutical patents and access to essential drugs.
In my favorite
fields of technology law, patent law,
international intellectual property law and economic analysis of
law, cross-disciplinary studies are essential.
Penn Law』s unique
LL.M program can provide me an excellent opportunity to enrich my
study in inter-disciplinary work. Penn
Law』s LL.M program can lay a solid foundation for my research
career, and I believe my admiration for law, and my academic
performance and work experience also make me competent for the
program. Although my
plan has been delayed for seven years, time and experience have made
me realize what is essential to me. The
energy accumulated is enormous and I am prepared to set out on my
journey to explore the extensive world of law.
|