Course Description:
This course is recommended for advanced students who are interested in going on to study in literature, cultural studies or related fields at the graduate level. The course, along with LCII, introduces some of the basic texts of literary and cultural criticism. During the first semester we will focus on the question of the content of literature and its moral, social and political readings; the second semester will explore the question of form and the development of formalisms and structuralisms. In other words, the course is loosely divided thematically as well as historically, in order to explore in depth the ideas that have developed out of the ongoing debate concerning content vs. form, or politics vs. art, which threads through the Western canon of literary criticism. This division is not an absolute one, and students are advised to take the course both semesters in order to get a more complete picture of the development of the field. LCI focuses more on contemporary literary criticism, while LCII includes more pre-twentieth century criticism. However both semesters will move from early texts into the modern and contemporary fields, tracing different arguments within the canon. This semester, for example, we will discuss the influence of Plato and Neo-Platonism on two contemporary films, The Matrix and The Lord of the Rings, both of which explore questions of ethics and representation, epistemology and social relations.
This semester we begin with an introduction to contemporary literary criticism's attempt to understand its own humanist assumptions and worldviews, discussing Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818) as a novel that pushes humanist thought to its limits. Next we explore the roots and later development of the humanist tradition in philosophical and literary thinking about the meaning, value and social implications of cultural representation from classical times into the modern era. As we do so the initial focus on morality and authenticity will develop into discussions of rights and modernity. Figures and schools we will cover include Plato and Neo-Platonism; Enlightenment theories of knowledge and rights; Marx and Marxism; and the Victorian concept of culture at the peak of British imperialism. Finally, we will look at how these developments gave rise to contemporary literary theory following the social movements of the 20th century. To this end, we will study contemporary Marxist, feminist, and postcolonial readings of Frankenstein, a novel that responds to the ethical dilemmas of its time by narrating the pinnacle of Western society and its humanist thought partly through the eyes of the monster that it created.
Requirements:
Students will be expected to carefully read substantial weekly assignments in difficult English-sometimes in small, anthology-size print. There will be quizzes at the beginning of each class period on that week's readings, and a final essay exam. The quizzes will test for careful and thorough preparation of assigned materials. After the quizzes, class meetings will consist of brief lectures and discussions in groups: active and engaged participation is required.
Important:
Students should finish the novel Frankenstein before class begins.
Grading policy:
weekly quizzes: 40%; final essay exam: 50%; participation: 10%. In addition, not attending class and not turning in quizzes are grounds for failing the course. Attendance is required.
Textbooks:
- Course Reader, available at Gaoguan; students should purchase it before class begins.
- Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, Norton Critical Edition. The novel is divided into three parts or volumes: Volume II must be read in English, while Volumes I and III can be read either in English or in Chinese translation.
Schedule:
W1 |
02-19 |
“What’s Literary Theory?” LT 1-9; “Humanist Literary Theory” LT 10-30; IP 3-5, 16-35 |
W2 |
02-26 |
Shelley, Frankenstein Volume 1
|
W3 |
03-05 |
Shelley, Frankenstein Volumes 2-3
|
W4 |
03-12 |
Plato, NA 33-80 from Ion and Republic; HLC 12-24
|
W5 |
03-19 |
“Watching The Matrix Philosophically” (screening of The Matrix, discussion using handout provided in class).
|
W6 |
03-26 |
Partridge, “Plato’s Cave and The Matrix” 239-257; HLC 24-40
Make-up class for Week 17: view scenes from LOTR on _____.
|
W7 |
04-02 |
HLC 129-148 (on Neo-Platonism and Boethius); Shippey, from “The Lord of the Rings (2): Concepts of Evil” 128-143 (a reading of the Boethian elements in LOTR)
|
W8 |
04-09 |
The Enlightenment: HLC 311-320; Locke, HLC 320-324; IP 64-65; Morgan, “Frankenstein’s Singular Events: Inductive Reasoning, Narrative Technique and Generic Classification”
|
W9 |
04-16 |
View Young Frankenstein; discuss references to Enlightenment epistemology, natural philosophy, and nature/the natural as a concept.
|
W10 |
04-23 |
Literature and national cultures I: Arnold HLC 520-526, NA 802-805, 825-832. |
W11 |
04-30 |
Literature and national cultures II: Eagleton NA 2240-2249 |
W12 |
05-07 |
Marx and Marxism I: LT 122-131; II: IP (from Hegel to Marx) 76-81, 90-97 (For reference in class: Moretti, from “Dialectic of Fear.”)
|
W13 |
05-14 |
Marx and Marxism II: LT 131-146 |
W14 |
05-21 |
The question of women and fiction: LT 88-98; Woolf, A Room of One’s Own, Chapter 2; Wollstonecraft HLC 339-345, NA 582-593
|
W15 |
05-28 |
Deconstructing women: Johnson, “ My Monster/My Self ” 241-251; Poovey, “ My Hideous Progeny: The Lady and the Monster ” 251-261
|
W16 |
06-04 |
Postcolonial criticism: HLC 737-749; from Rieder, “ Artificial Humans and the Construction of Race ” 97-101 and 117-122
|
W17 |
06-11 |
No class. |
W18 |
06-18 |
Final exam. |
Reader Contents(abbreviations and order of texts):
- LT: Literary Theory
- NA: The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism
- HLC: A History of Literary Criticism
- IP: Introducing Philosophy
- Partridge, “Plato’s Cave and The Matrix”
- Shippey, from “The Lord of the Rings (2): Concepts of Evil”
- Morgan, “Frankenstein’s Singular Events”
- Moretti, “Dialectic of Fear”
- Woolf, A Room of One’s Own, Chapter 2
- Johnson, “My Monster, My Self”
- Spivak, “[Frankenstein and a Critique of Imperialism]”
- Rieder, “Artificial Humans and the Construction of Race”
|