EL4055 論文寫作
Research Paper Writing, Spring 2010
Professor Parry 白瑞梅
Monday 9:00-11:50
Classroom A108
Office: A218; extension 33215
amie.parry@gmail.com
Course Description:
This course introduces students to writing research papers in the field of literature. Students will be required to participate actively in writing workshops and do extensive pre-writing, writing and rewriting. It is designed for upper division students who are able and willing to do a lot of weekly readings, both assigned and independent, and writing (weekly assignments), or who plan to do graduate study in literature, cultural studies, or related fields. The course has three objectives: 1) to familiarize students with the techniques of close reading and sharpen students’ interpretive skills in constructing their own sustained analysis of a literary text; 2) to guide students in the use of the MLA format for writing academic papers; 3) to teach students how to frame and then develop their reading as a response to the ongoing critical discussions of the primary text, a process that includes learning to search for, evaluate and incorporate secondary sources (literary criticism and theory on individual texts, writers, literary movements, and historical periods). Over the course of the semester each student will write a paper that involves independent research and that can be used as a model for writing samples and for later research writing projects. Our primary text this semester will be Bram Stoker’s Dracula. The other textbook, A Short Guide to Writing about Literature, covers close reading techniques, critical approaches and the MLA format. In addition, there will be a course reader with criticism on Dracula and sample student essays.
Course Policy:
Students will be graded on the following: weekly writing assignments; the final research paper and preliminary drafts; and lively class participation. We will think about writing as a process, so detailed rewriting is required, and the process of rewriting is part of what students will be graded on. Rewriting (and rethinking) will partly be done in class workshops, so attendance is mandatory. Up to three absences are permitted; if you miss more than three class meetings you will be advised to withdraw. Grades will be calculated according to the following breakdown:
Weekly workshops (writing assignments, attendance and class participation): 40%
Final paper and drafts: 60%
Schedule of classes:
W1 |
2-22 |
Introduction.
HW:
Read: SG Writing about Fiction 131-133, 138-140, 142-143, 147-151, 172-175.
Write: A 1-2 page analysis of setting and character (two of the elements of fiction from SG) in Chapter I. What can the narrative descriptions of time and place (and references to these in dialogue) reveal about Jonathan that would not be obvious if the reader did not pay close attention to the setting? Don’t cover all the material in the chapter; choose only two or three specific passages or one recurring motif.
Reference SG checklist 9. |
W2 |
3-1 |
Workshop: setting and symbolism analyses; discuss plot, character, foreshadowing, point of view.
HW:
Read: SG Chapter 3 “The Reader as Writer” Annotating a text 21-32. (Browse the rest of the chapter to get your prewriting started).
Annotate: Dracula Chapter XXVII for plot and POV.
Write: An analysis of POV and plot in Chapter XXVII. How is the POV technique in the final chapter different from the first chapter? How does the fragmented POV influence the meaning or significance of the final events of the narrative? Again, choose specific passages, one recurring motif, or one POV as a focus. |
W3 |
3-8 |
Workshop on note-taking: reading as writing.
HW:
Read: SG 302-304, 306-308 (on taking notes, documentation and plagiarism); “What Is Psychoanalytic Criticism?”
Write: Notes on “What Is Psychoanalytic Criticism”; a one-paragraph summary of one concept from psychoanalysis or psychoanalytic literary criticism. |
W4 |
3-15 |
Workshop on note-taking and summarizing.
HW:
Read: Foster, “The little children can be bitten.”
Write: In one or two sentences,
summarize Foster’s main thesis in your own words. Then write a 1-2 page analysis of
how Foster reads plot development symbolically--in other words, for Foster each step in
the plot is not just an event but also a symbol. Chose his reading of one development in the plot as a focus and analyze it in detail. |
W5 |
3-22 |
Group discussions on “The little children.” Thesis statements: what is Foster’s thesis, and how does he frame it as a part of an ongoing intellectual dialogue? Counterarguments: what possible counterarguments does he anticipate his readers might have, especially with regard to his Freudian understanding of childhood, and how does he address these in a way that strengthens and develops his argument?
HW:
Read: SG: “Remarks about Manuscript Form” 290-296.
Write: In a unified essay (approximately 2-3 pages) with a thesis statement, respond to one idea from Foster’s essay. You can agree and apply the idea to another aspect of the novel that he doesn’t consider, offer an alternative reading (one that is also psychoanalytic), or do a little of both. |
W6 |
3-29 |
View “Buffy vs. Dracula”; group discussions on it using psychoanalytic terms.
HW:
Read: “What Is the New Historicism?”
Write: Notes on “What Is the New Historicism?”; a one-paragraph summary of one concept from New Historicism. |
W7 |
4-5 |
Tomb sweeping |
W8 |
4-12 |
Summary workshop. Discussion of New Historicism.
HW:
Read: “Ambivalence and Ascendency in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.”
Write: In one or two sentences, summarize Castle’s main thesis in your own words. Then analyze one example of his use of historical secondary sources. How does he present historical issues and questions, and how does he build a reading of the novel out of his discussion of history? |
W9 |
4-19 |
View “Vampires in America.” Group brainstorming sessions for historicized research questions for the mockumentary.
HW:
Write: Choose one scene from the novel and do a close reading of it using Foster’s approach; then use Castle’s essay to read the same scene. In this instance, to what extent are their frameworks mutually exclusive, and to what extent can their ideas be synthesized?
Reference: SG comparison checklist, 60. |
W10 |
4-26 |
Workshops on comparison papers. Discuss topics.
HW:
Read: SG The Writing Process 5-9, Evaluating Sources on the WWW 330-333.
Research: secondary sources.
Write: final paper topic idea. |
W11 |
5-3 |
Workshop on topics. Sample essays. Schedule conferences.
HW:
Write: Proposal. Due 5-8 |
W12 |
5-10 |
Conferences.
HW:
Write: Outline. |
W13 |
5-17 |
Workshop on outlines. Logical fallacies. SG Documentation 306-321.
HW:
Write: Revise outline; write first draft.
Reference: Checklist for Avoiding Plagiarism 308. |
W14 |
5-24 |
Workshop on first draft. Thesis statement, defining your terms. Sample essays.
HW:
Write: Final draft. |
W15 |
5-31 |
Workshop on final draft. Style and format, counterarguments. Schedule conferences.
HW:
Write: revision plan. Due 6-5. |
W16 |
6-7 |
Title workshop; conferences on revision plan.
HW:
Write: Revised final draft. |
W17 |
6-14 |
no class |
W18 |
6-24 |
Revised final draft due. |
|