English for Practical Purposes—Fall 2002
實用英文

Jo (A210, Tu 2-5 or by appointment)


A Few Tips on How to Write a Letter of Recommendation 

 

As an employer, coworker, or friend, you may at some point in your career be called upon to write a letter of recommendation. If you are unsure about how to go about it or simply don't know what to say, here are some tips about what to include and how to structure a typical letter of recommendation. This advice may also be useful if you request a letter of recommendation from someone who is not familiar with how to write one.

First Paragraph -- Start out by specifying in what capacity and for how long you have know the person whom you are recommending. If the person is an employee or coworker, indicate the term of employment, the responsibilities of the position, and any significant projects undertaken by the individual. You may wish to include a sentence about the nature of your company and its activities. Here, you can also give a one-sentence summary or overview of your opinion of the recommended individual.

Second Paragraph -- In the next paragraph provide a more detailed evaluation of the person as an employee. Describe his or her performance on specific assignments and list any important accomplishments. What are the individual's strengths or shortcomings in the workplace? What was it like to interact with him or her?

Third Paragraph -- To sum things up you can make a more broad characterization of the individual and his or her demeanor. Overall, was the person responsible, polite, warm, disagreeable, lazy, spiteful? Finally, indicate the degree to which you recommend the individual for the position she or he is seeking: without reservation, strongly, with some reservation, or not at all.

Before writing the letter, you may want to ask the person for a list of his or her projects, since you probably will not be aware of all the work they've done. Finally, if you have not had much contact with the person, you may be better off declining to write the letter of recommendation, rather than putting together something vague and dispassionate.

Positive Recommendation Letter

Hart Publications, Inc.
1400 Fifth Avenue,
New York, NY 10012
(212) 555-6239

April 10, 1998 

Subject: Letter of Recommendation for Mr. James Miller 

To Whom It May Concern:

James worked under my supervision as an editorial assistant from September 10, 1997, until April 5, 1998. His responsibilities included conducting research and interviews, fact checking, and writing brief front-of-the-book pieces, in addition to some clerical duties. During the course of his employment, James proved himself to be an able employee, a hard worker, and a talented writer.

I was quite impressed by James' ability to complete all work assigned to him on time, if not before it was due. His research was always thorough and comprehensive, and his fact checking always accurate. We sometimes allow our editorial assistants to do some writing, but James' talents prompted us to assign him more pieces than the norm. His writing is clear, concise, and evocative.

Overall, James is a very conscientious and able employee. I certainly believe he has what it takes to make a wonderful editor someday, and I am sad to see him leave. I strongly recommend James for any mid-level editorial position in publishing.

Sincerely, 

Edward P. Larkin
Executive Editor


Negative Recommendation Letter

E-Center
34 East 23rd Street
New York, NY 10009
(212) 555-8725

August 27, 1998

Letter of Recommendation for Lisa Johnson

To Whom It May Concern:

Lisa Johnson was employed by E-Center as a Web Developer from June 10, 1998, to August 22, 1998. Her responsibilities included converting Photoshop mock-ups to HTML, implementing CGI scripts, and creating interactive DHTML features. During her time with us, Lisa showed herself to be a less than ideal employee.

Although much of the work Lisa completed was satisfactory, most of her assignments were finished after stated deadlines. Many of her programs contained multiple errors. When her superiors offered her constructive criticism, she showed little desire to improve and demonstrated an overall resistance to any sort of critique of her work. Lisa's attitude in the workplace appears to be her major shortcoming.

Lisa may have the potential to become an excellent programmer, however, her reluctance to accept criticism prevents her from becoming such. I would hesitate to recommend Lisa for any job where she might be required to accept commentary on her performance or be expected to show signs of improvement. She does have the ability to complete basic programming projects.

Sincerely,

Eliza P. Walker
Executive Producer